One-second product verdicts from real owners — and every failure delivered straight to the maker, so the next one gets better. Enter the invite password to look around.
Point your phone at the barcode. One second later: active recalls, and how the product is actually holding up for the people who own it.
No stars. Ever. Every number carries its denominator.
Every failure reaches the maker. That's how the next one gets better.
Everyone has the month-14 story. On Vouchd it doesn't vanish into a review site — it lands on the manufacturer's desk, with receipts.
Report the failure the moment it happens. Your months of ownership travel with it, so it reads as evidence, not a rant.
“Move the button. Seal the seam.” Say it once — it reaches the maker as feedback they can build, even brands that aren't on Vouchd yet.
Four lines, no adjectives. Every number is a count of something that happened — and it never travels without its denominator.
EU Safety Gate and CPSC, queried the moment you scan — even for products nobody here owns yet.
Every owner answer is a marker on the same poor→best track: owner verdicts 85 · still going 89 · would buy again 93. Still going is survival, not sentiment — survivors at 1 year ÷ owners whose first year is on record, so a unit sold or gifted before the horizon counts neither way. The V-Score is the markers' plain mean: (85+89+93) ÷ 3 = 89.
27 owners, ~14 months tracked. A percentage without its base is how you end up back at Amazon. Under five owners the numbers speak in words: “2 of 3 still going.”
“Would buy again” is asked of tracked owners months in — never strangers on delivery day.
Every question owners answer becomes a marker on one poor→best track. The V-Score is their plain average — no secret weighting, ever. An aspect needs 3 answers to appear, and wears “early” under 5.
The same survival arithmetic runs at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years — because “lasts” means something different at five years than at one, and a product's record grows as its owners do.
A unit sold at month 30 IS a 2-year survivor — it simply isn't counted at 3. A horizon prints once 3 owners' fates are on record there; under 5 it speaks in words, not percent — that's the “3 of 4” above, not “75%.”
Dropped, crushed, run over — that's something that happened to a unit, not a unit failing on its own. It leaves the record clean, and never counts against the maker.
Durability keeps running through a repair — only a death stops it. Reliability stops at the first breakdown, repair included. EN 45552 draws the same line; so do we.
Bought refurbished, or handed down — those owners are still on the record. A second life is a durability compliment, not a gap in one.
every horizon carries its base and its walls, same as the V-Score above — see the full arithmetic at /numbers.
Star averages are written on day one, by strangers, and everything lands between 4.2 and 4.7. The review that matters is written at month 14 — so that's the only kind we count.
There is no review-writing chore in Vouchd. You check things you were going to buy anyway — everything else follows from that.
Scan the barcode. Verdict in a second. Walk away or buy — either way you're covered.
Every check lands in your list. Nothing to file, nothing to remember.
Bought it? Promote it from your history. Its story starts — silently. No “how excited are you?”
No prompts. No diary. Maybe one “still going?” tap a year. That's the point.
The zipper died. You say so — and it lands on the maker's desk with 14 months of receipts behind it.
✋ Same here ×41Recalls don't make the evening news. Vouchd checks the official registers at the moment you scan — the free recall check works even without an account.
Run a free recall checkThe check, your history, recall alerts — free. This only works if everyone checks.
Brands subscribe to the dashboard that shows what's failing and what to fix. That's the whole business.
No ads. No affiliate links. A paid claim can never bury a fault report or touch a number.
One line, everyone counted: the V-Score as owner answers accumulated — today's rules, replayed through time. Old stock keeps selling after a change, so the line climbs as new units earn their answers. The maker's mark shows when — the line shows whether. No resets, no hiding, ever.
Nobody can be “EU compliant” for a law that isn't in force yet, so we won't say it. What's true today: the method above was already built to the concepts those laws measure by.
Every horizon in the survival record maps onto EN 45552's own concepts — durability, reliability, limiting state, external damage — one for one, in public.
Every counted answer needs a real owning journey behind it — the check the UCPD's Annex I, point 23b, asks brands to run before calling reviews genuine.
Versioned, dated, public. If a number can't survive being recomputed by a stranger, we don't print it. Read it →
An accident isn't a failure. An owner who sells or moves on is marked unknown, never quietly counted as fine. A low score is an observation, not an allegation of illegality.
For makers: the EU's right-to-repair rules apply from 31 Jul 2026; EmpCo — the law requiring any durability claim to be backed by evidence — follows on 27 Sept 2026. The laws are starting to demand exactly the evidence we've been collecting since day one.
Outside the EU: the method doesn't change at a border — a disclosed methodology and a counted observation read the same under FTC substantiation rules as under EmpCo.
Your owners are already reporting here — part, cause, and months of ownership attached, queuing for you even before you claim. Forty-one owners, same hinge, same month: that lands as one structured engineering ticket, not forty-one angry stars. Acknowledge it and buyers see a maker who listens; fix it and the score line above proves it, publicly.
Claim your brandPrivate beta · web app live · iOS via TestFlight — ask for an invite